Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  76 / 248 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 76 / 248 Next Page
Page Background

74

BLUE LABEL INTEGRATED ANNUAL REPORT 2015

INTERNATIONAL

The strategy of the International

Distribution segment is to pursue growth

opportunities for Group products and

services across its global footprint, by

systematically rolling out points

of presence, in a replication of the proven

South African business model. As at the

end of March 2015 the Group disposed

of its non-controlling interest in Smart

Voucher Limited, trading as Ukash.

Blue Label Mexico

The business in Mexico encapsulates a number of

agreements with key participants in the sales and

distribution channels, including the major network

operators and the world’s largest bakery, Grupo

Bimbo, a joint 46.64% shareholder with Blue Label

in BLM.

In September 2014 BLM implemented a strategic

decision to become a multi-carrier for all networks.

This initiative was costly to BLM in that the

dominant network immediately reduced BLM’s

commission. As a result thereof, it took nine months

to regain lost ground incurred, during which both

terminal activity and commissions earned from

other carriers increased.

OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW

CONTINUED

The project to expand the distribution network

across Mexico progresses steadily with some

62 000 terminals active at present. BLM continues

to redeploy underperforming devices and to retrofit

mature devices to include financial services

transaction capabilities.

Products and services on offer through BLM’s

technology platform continue to expand. The range

now includes PINless recharge, bill payments, cash

collections, card acquiring through Banamex and

Visa and digital food vouchers through all five major

distributors. Distribution of SIM cards through most

of the major networks and an international money

transfer service are currently being piloted.

Blue Label’s share of losses for the year amounted to

R89 million (2014: R60.8 million loss), consistent

with continued margin compression and an increase

in overhead costs.