Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  49 / 220 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 49 / 220 Next Page
Page Background

Structure

The Board accepts its responsibility

for the governance of risk, which

includes the total process of risk

management and the formation of

its opinion on the effectiveness of the

process. The Board forms its opinion

on the process of risk management

based on the recommendations of

the ARCC and is satisfied with the

effectiveness of the risk management

process. The ARCC is responsible

for ensuring that the Group has

implemented an effective policy and

plan for risk management and that

the risk disclosures are comprehensive,

timely and relevant. The Board

and committees’ responsibilities

are documented in the Blue Label

Integrated Risk Assurance Policy and

Framework.

Management is accountable to the

Board for designing, implementing

and monitoring the process of risk

management. The Internal Risk and

Compliance Committee function

(IRCC), established by management,

supports the enterprise-wide risk

approach by identifying, evaluating

and measuring Group-wide risks and

compliance in all functional areas of

the Group, as well as maintaining

adequate internal controls. The IRCC

reports to the ARCC bi-annually in

this regard, which oversees the

effectiveness of risk management

arrangements.

Process

Group-wide strategic risk assessments

are conducted bi-annually. These

assessments are facilitated by the

internal auditor, which plays an

important role in evaluating the risk

management process and guiding

management to continuing

improvement. The internal auditor

does not take any direct responsibility

for making risk management decisions

or managing the risk management

function. The risk assessment process

incorporates value drivers that guide

the Group’s strategic pursuits. The risk

assessments conducted involve risk

identification and prioritisation at

subsidiary and holding company level,

followed by interviews with Senior

Management at subsidiary level and

key members of Executive

Management to confirm risks, their

descriptions and prioritisation. Each

risk is evaluated in terms of the

potential impact, the likelihood of

occurrence and the perceived

effectiveness of controls in place to

manage the risks according to set

criteria. The Group has identified its

strategic risks and acknowledges that

its appetite to accept risk varies across

those identified. The assessment

process includes the setting of risk

appetite and tolerance on a qualitative

basis. The outcome of the risk

assessments is integral in refining our

strategic response and in developing a

plan for internal audit engagements

for the forthcoming year. Action plans

are documented in response to risk

appetite and tolerance thresholds that

are breached. The Integrated Risk

Assurance Policy and Framework will

be updated to incorporate the

identification and management of

opportunities. The Group’s material

risks are listed on pages 12 to 14.

Governance of risk

BLUE LABEL

INTEGRATED ANNUAL REPORT 2017

47

/