Structure
The Board accepts its responsibility
for the governance of risk, which
includes the total process of risk
management and the formation of
its opinion on the effectiveness of the
process. The Board forms its opinion
on the process of risk management
based on the recommendations of
the ARCC and is satisfied with the
effectiveness of the risk management
process. The ARCC is responsible
for ensuring that the Group has
implemented an effective policy and
plan for risk management and that
the risk disclosures are comprehensive,
timely and relevant. The Board
and committees’ responsibilities
are documented in the Blue Label
Integrated Risk Assurance Policy and
Framework.
Management is accountable to the
Board for designing, implementing
and monitoring the process of risk
management. The Internal Risk and
Compliance Committee function
(IRCC), established by management,
supports the enterprise-wide risk
approach by identifying, evaluating
and measuring Group-wide risks and
compliance in all functional areas of
the Group, as well as maintaining
adequate internal controls. The IRCC
reports to the ARCC bi-annually in
this regard, which oversees the
effectiveness of risk management
arrangements.
Process
Group-wide strategic risk assessments
are conducted bi-annually. These
assessments are facilitated by the
internal auditor, which plays an
important role in evaluating the risk
management process and guiding
management to continuing
improvement. The internal auditor
does not take any direct responsibility
for making risk management decisions
or managing the risk management
function. The risk assessment process
incorporates value drivers that guide
the Group’s strategic pursuits. The risk
assessments conducted involve risk
identification and prioritisation at
subsidiary and holding company level,
followed by interviews with Senior
Management at subsidiary level and
key members of Executive
Management to confirm risks, their
descriptions and prioritisation. Each
risk is evaluated in terms of the
potential impact, the likelihood of
occurrence and the perceived
effectiveness of controls in place to
manage the risks according to set
criteria. The Group has identified its
strategic risks and acknowledges that
its appetite to accept risk varies across
those identified. The assessment
process includes the setting of risk
appetite and tolerance on a qualitative
basis. The outcome of the risk
assessments is integral in refining our
strategic response and in developing a
plan for internal audit engagements
for the forthcoming year. Action plans
are documented in response to risk
appetite and tolerance thresholds that
are breached. The Integrated Risk
Assurance Policy and Framework will
be updated to incorporate the
identification and management of
opportunities. The Group’s material
risks are listed on pages 12 to 14.
Governance of risk
BLUE LABEL
INTEGRATED ANNUAL REPORT 2017
47
/




