Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  71 / 220 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 71 / 220 Next Page
Page Background

f

reviewed the effectiveness of the

systems of internal control, including

internal financial control and risk

management.

The ARCC has evaluated the internal

audit function and satisfied itself to

place reliance thereon.

The ARCC concludes that the design

and implementation of internal

controls, including financial controls

and risk management, are effective.

Refer to page 50 for the arrangements

in place for combined assurance. The

ARCC concludes that the combined

assurance arrangement is effective and

will continue to evolve as the Group

grows.

Risk management and

compliance

The Committee:

f

reviewed the integrity of the risk

control systems and ensured that

the risk policies and strategies of the

Company are effectively managed;

f

made recommendations to the

Board concerning the levels of

tolerance and risk appetite;

f

monitored bi-annual risk

assessments;

f

ensured that management

considered and implemented

appropriate risk responses;

f

reviewed legal matters that could

have a material impact on the

Group; and

f

reviewed developments in corporate

governance and best practice and

considered their impact and

implications across the Group with

particular reference to the principles

of King IV.

Expertise and effectiveness of

the Financial Director and

finance function

The Committee considered the

appropriateness of the expertise and

effectiveness of the Financial Director

and finance function in accordance

with the JSE Listings Requirements

and governance best practice.

The Committee confirms that it is

satisfied that Dean Suntup possesses

the appropriate expertise and

experience to effectively discharge his

responsibilities as Financial Director,

and confirms the effectiveness of the

finance function.

Annual financial statements

The Committee has reviewed the

accounting policies and financial

statements of the Company and the

Group and is satisfied that they are

appropriate and comply with

International Financial Reporting

Standards, the JSE Listings

Requirements and the requirements

of the Act.

The Committee has evaluated the

Group and Company financial

statements of Blue Label Telecoms

Limited for the year ended 31 May

2017 and based on the information

provided to the Committee, the

Committee recommends the adoption

of the annual financial statements by

the Board.

The significant audit matters

considered by the Committee were:

1. the impairment assessment of

goodwill arising from business

combinations;

2. the impairment assessment of the

investment in BLM; and

3. the fair value assessment of the

investment in Oxigen, Oxigen

Online and 2DFine.

These matters were addressed as

follows:

The impairment assessment of

goodwill arising from business

combinations

For the year ended 31 May 2017,

management performed an

impairment assessment over the

goodwill balance as follows:

f

assessing the recoverable amount as

being value-in-use, as entities are

held for trading and not for sale;

f

calculating the value-in-use for each

cash-generating unit (CGU) using a

discounted cash flow model; and

f

performing a sensitivity analysis over

the value-in-use calculations, by

varying the assumptions used

(growth rates, terminal growth rate

and WACC, i.e. discount rate) to

assess the impact on the valuations.

Management concluded there was no

need for any impairment.

The impairment assessment of the

investment in BLM

For the year ended 31 May 2017,

management performed an

impairment assessment over the

investment in BLM as follows:

f

assessing the recoverable amount as

being value-in-use, as BLM is held

for trading and not for sale;

f

calculating the value-in-use for BLM

using a discounted cash flow model;

f

performing a sensitivity analysis over

the value-in-use calculations, by

varying the assumptions used

(growth rates, terminal growth rate

and WACC, i.e. discount rate) to

assess the impact on the valuation;

and

f

as a final check, comparing the

carrying value of the Group’s

investment in BLM with the

calculated value-in-use.

Management concluded there was no

need for any impairment.

BLUE LABEL

INTEGRATED ANNUAL REPORT 2017

69

/