2. Group composition
  Basis of consolidation
(a) Subsidiaries
 

Subsidiaries are all entities (including structured entities) over which the Group has control. The Group controls an entity when the Group is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group. They are deconsolidated from the date that control ceases.

The Group applies the acquisition method to account for business combinations. The consideration transferred for the acquisition of a subsidiary is the fair value of the assets transferred, the liabilities incurred to the former owners of the acquiree and the equity interests issued by the Group. The consideration transferred includes the fair value of any asset or liability resulting from a contingent consideration arrangement. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured initially at their fair values at the acquisition date. The Group recognises any non-controlling interest in the acquiree on an acquisition by acquisition basis, either at fair value or at the non-controlling interest's proportionate share of the recognised amounts of the acquiree's identifiable net assets. If the business combination is achieved in stages, the acquisition date carrying value of the acquirer's previously held equity interest in the acquiree is remeasured to fair value at the acquisition date. Any gains or losses arising from such remeasurement are recognised in profit or loss.

Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred.

Any contingent consideration to be transferred is recognised at fair value at the acquisition date. Subsequent changes to the fair value of the contingent consideration that is deemed to be an asset or liability are recognised in profit or loss in other income or other expenses.

The excess of the consideration transferred, the amount of any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and the acquisition date fair value of any previous equity interest in the acquiree over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired are recorded as goodwill. If the total consideration transferred, non-controlling interest recognised and previously held interest measured are less than the fair value of the net assets of the subsidiary acquired in the case of a bargain purchase, the difference is recognised directly in the income statement.

Inter-company transactions, balances and unrealised gains on transactions between Group companies are eliminated. Unrealised losses are also eliminated. When necessary, amounts reported by subsidiaries have been adjusted to conform with the Group's accounting policies.

(b) Changes in ownership interests in subsidiaries without change of control

Transactions with non-controlling interests that do not result in loss of control are accounted for as equity transactions, i.e. transactions with the owners in their capacity as owners. The difference between fair value of any consideration paid and the relevant share acquired of the carrying value of net assets of the subsidiary is recorded in equity. Gains or losses on disposals to non-controlling interests are also recorded in equity.

When entering into a written put on a non-controlling interest, the initial liability is recognised at the present value of the expected settlement price with a corresponding adjustment to equity. Thereafter if the non-controlling interest continues to be recognised, the Group takes subsequent changes in the expected changes in the liability as an adjustment in profit or loss. The Group believes this is an appropriate accounting policy, because there is no clear guidance in IFRS as to whether IFRS 9 or 10 should be applied to the presentation of the remeasurement of a liability.

(c) Disposal of subsidiaries

When the Group ceases to have control, any retained interest in the entity is remeasured to its fair value at the date when control is lost, with the change in carrying amount recognised in profit or loss. The fair value is the initial carrying amount for the purposes of subsequently accounting for the retained interest as an associate, joint venture or financial asset. In addition, any amounts previously recognised in other comprehensive income in respect of that entity are accounted for as if the Group had directly disposed of the related assets or liabilities. This may mean that amounts previously recognised in other comprehensive income are reclassified to profit or loss.

(d) Associates and joint ventures

Investments in associates and joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method, the investment is initially recognised at cost, and the carrying amount is increased or decreased to recognise the investor's share of the profit or loss of the investee after the date of acquisition. The Group's investment in associates and joint ventures includes goodwill identified on acquisition. Loans made to associates and joint ventures that are equity in nature are treated as part of the cost of the investment made.

Associates are all entities over which the Group has significant influence but not control, generally accompanying a shareholding of between 20% and 50% of the voting rights.

Investments in joint arrangements are classified as either joint operations or joint ventures depending on the contractual rights and obligations of each investor. The Group has assessed the nature of its joint arrangements and determined them to be joint ventures.

The Group's share of post-acquisition profit or loss is recognised in the income statement, and its share of post-acquisition movements in other comprehensive income is recognised in other comprehensive income with a corresponding adjustment to the carrying amount of the investment. The carrying amount of the investment is also adjusted for the Group's share of post-acquisition movements in other net assets.

The Group excludes equity-settled share-based payment charges from its share in profits or losses from associates and joint ventures. As a result, it does not recognise the corresponding attributable share of the related share-based payment reserve within equity.

The Group determines at each reporting date if there are any indicators which would require the Group to test whether the investment in the associate or joint venture is impaired. If this is the case, the Group calculates the amount of impairment as the difference between the recoverable amount of the associate or joint venture and its carrying value and recognises the amount adjacent to share of profit/(loss) from associates in the income statement.

Dilution gains and losses arising in investments in associates and joint ventures are recognised in the income statement.

If the ownership interest in an associate is reduced but significant influence is retained, only a proportionate share of the amounts previously recognised in other comprehensive income is reclassified to profit or loss where appropriate.

When the Group's share of losses in an associate or joint venture equals or exceeds its interests in the associate or joint venture (which includes any long-term interests that, in substance, form part of the Group's net investment in the associate or joint venture), the Group does not recognise further losses, unless it has incurred obligations or made payments on behalf of the associate or joint venture. Where an impairment is recognised in respect of an associate or joint venture, the Group's share of equity-accounted results reflect amortisation based on an adjusted impaired fair value.

Critical accounting judgements and assumptions

(a) Valuation of intangible assets acquired as part of a business combination

The fair values of all identifiable intangible assets acquired as part of a business combination are determined using recognised valuation techniques. Such techniques often rely on forecasts of future cash flows and the use of appropriate discount rates that reflect the risk factors associated with the cash flows.

These valuations are based on information at the time of the acquisition and the expectations and assumptions that have been deemed reasonable by the Group's management. The risk exists that the underlying assumptions or events associated with such assets will not occur as projected. For these reasons, among others, the actual cash flows may vary from forecasts of future cash flows.

(b) Assessment of investment in associates and joint ventures for impairment

The Group tests annually whether investment in associates and joint ventures has suffered any impairment, in accordance with the accounting policy. The recoverable amounts of the investment in associates and joint ventures have been determined based on value-in-use calculations. These calculations require the use of estimates.

(c) Classification of significant joint arrangements

The Group exercises judgement in determining the classification of its joint arrangements.

(d) Classification of significant associates

Cell C Limited

Blue Label Telecoms acting through its wholly owned subsidiary, The Prepaid Company Proprietary Limited, acquired a 45% interest in Cell C Limited. The Group will be entitled to appoint four of the 11 Directors to the Cell C Board, which will represent 36% of the overall votes of the Board. Based on the Group's shareholding and representation on the Board, management has assessed Cell C Limited to be an associate as the Group will have the power to participate in (but not control) the financial and operating policy decisions of Cell C Limited.

The arrangement between Cell C and Comm Equipment Company (CEC) as described in note 4.2, has not altered the decision making power of the Group over Cell C. Therefore the Group continues to account for Cell C as an associate.

(e) Going concern of Cell C

For purposes of the Group's annual financial statements, Cell C has been accounted for using the going concern assumption. Based on the following facts available, management is of the opinion that Cell C will continue as a going concern for the foreseeable future:

Cell C concluded the national roaming agreement on 7 August 2019, which became effective on 4 May 2020. This agreement is one of the key pillars in Cell C's transformation plan, as well as its long-term network strategy to optimise operating costs and reduce capital outlay as part of the turnaround strategy. This agreement is anticipated to positively impact the cost base and future cash flows on the successful implementation of this transaction.

The Board of Cell C established a liquidity committee to monitor the liquidity position of Cell C and to ensure that the business is not trading recklessly during the negotiations of the recapitalisation and debt restructure. Although the liquidity position of Cell C remains challenging, Cell C has proven that it has managed to continue trading despite the liquidity concerns and management is confident that this committee will manage the liquidity position of Cell C until the conclusion of the recapitalisation process.

Cell C appointed independent financial restructuring advisers to assist in stringent monitoring of the liquidity of Cell C, as well as designing the revised business plans that support the new operating business model. Stakeholders have appointed independent advisers to assist with the recapitalisation and/or debt restructuring process and formal engagements are ongoing.

A roaming agreement with Vodacom was concluded in November 2020 which is aligned to Cell C's revised network strategy, aimed at managing capacity in a more scalable and cost-efficient manner through a roaming model. Contract and broadband customers have been transitioned in stages to roam on the Vodacom network. The strategic vision is to differentiate Cell C by focusing on innovative products and services without being owners of capital intensive infrastructure. This creates more flexibility and capacity to deliver the right quality of service to our current and future customers.

Cell C embarked on a strategy to reconsider its current service offering, whereby Cell C identified the need to either wind down or restructure the service offering being provided to its postpaid mobile telecommunication business (the base). During the 2021 financial year, the Group, through its subsidiary Comm Equipment Company (CEC), entered into an arrangement with Cell C to facilitate Cell C's operation of the base. The agreement commenced on 1 November 2020 for an initial period of five years, with CEC having the right to renew for a further four years. CEC is entitled to receive a share of the subscription income generated by Cell C from a subset of postpaid subscribers that sign up, extend or upgrade their subscriptions with Cell C after 1 November 2020 (New and Upgrade subscribers) plus certain fixed and variable payments. Cell C will remain entitled to the subscription income of existing subscribers at 31 October 2020 for the remainder of the subscribers' contract and a share of the ongoing revenue of New and Upgrade subscribers. The aim of the reorganisation would be for the base to remain intact and grow in the future, and for Cell C to have limited downside risk on the base.

On 4 August 2020, Cell C notified its noteholders that it defaulted on the payment of capital on its USD184 002 000 8.625% First Priority Senior Secured Notes which was due on 2 August 2020; as well as interest and capital repayments related to the respective bilateral loan facilities between Cell C and Nedbank Limited, China Development Bank Corporation, Development Bank of Southern Africa Limited and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited, which were due in January and July 2020.

Currently, none of the bilateral loan facilities have been accelerated as noteholders are aware and support that Cell C is committed to resolving the situation by agreeing to restructuring terms with its lenders while it also continues to work proactively with all stakeholders to improve its liquidity, debt profile and long-term competitiveness.

Management and the Directors have taken the default into consideration as part of their overall assessment of the going concern principle for Cell C and are of the view that the going concern assumption is still applicable. The default does not change any judgements or assumptions made in the financial assumptions that are dependent on the continued operation of Cell C as a going concern.

On 26 August 2021, TPC concluded a term sheet for an Airtime Purchase transaction with Investec Bank Limited, FirstRand Bank Limited (acting through its Rand Merchant Bank division) and other financiers, the proceeds of which are intended to be utilised for the recapitalisation of Cell C. This arrangement was subject to the conclusion of all legal documentation and fulfilment of all conditions precedent under such legal documentation.

On 15 March 2022, Blue Label concluded a non-binding term sheet ("Umbrella Restructure Term Sheet") with Cell C and various Cell C financial stakeholders (including certain shareholders and creditors of Cell C). In terms of the Umbrella Restructure Term Sheet, Cell C will be restructured and refinanced (the "Proposed Transaction") with the purpose of deleveraging its balance sheet, providing it with liquidity with which to operate and grow its businesses and to position itself to achieve long-term success for the benefit of its customers, employees, creditors, shareholders and its other stakeholders. The Umbrella Restructure Term Sheet is non-binding, save for stand-still provisions and certain provisions of a general nature which are binding.

The salient terms of the Proposed Transaction are set out below:

Capital and debt restructure:

In order to facilitate the restructuring of Cell C's debt owing to certain secured lenders totalling c.R7.3 billion, with such amount being fixed as at November 2019, TPC shall loan to Cell C an amount required to affect a compromise offer to be made by Cell C to certain of its secured lenders of a maximum amount of up to R1.46 billion ("TPC Debt Funding"). It is anticipated that TPC's actual funding obligation in respect of the compromise offer will, however, amount to R1.03 billion.

The TPC Debt Funding will be provided by TPC to Cell C in the form of a secured loan. Cell C will utilise the TPC Debt Funding to settle the claims of secured lenders by paying an amount of 20c to the rand.

Certain secured lenders have indicated that they wish to remain invested in Cell C. These secured lenders will be entitled to loan an amount equal to the 20c received, back to Cell C under a new loan arrangement ("Reinvestment Instrument"). The Reinvestment Instrument, which will be interest bearing and secured, will have an aggregate capital face value equal to 2.75 times of the amount advanced. In addition, the participating lenders will be entitled to share pro-rata in a fresh issue of ordinary shares in Cell C at a nominal value. All shareholders of Cell C will dilute proportionately to enable the issuance of these ordinary shares to the participating lenders.

Simultaneously but separately with the issuance of the Reinvestment Instrument, Cell C will, pursuant to a rights issue at nominal value, allot and issue shares to TPC. Following such issue and various other issues of shares to be made by Cell C to third parties at nominal value pursuant to the Proposed Transaction, TPC will hold approximately 49.3% of the shares in Cell C, inclusive of those shares which TPC will be entitled to, pursuant to the Reinvestment Instrument.

In addition, CEC (a wholly owned subsidiary of TPC) will defer an amount of R1.1 billion owed by Cell C and some of its subsidiaries to it on the date of implementation of the Proposed Transaction ("the Effective Date"), which amount will be repaid in equal monthly instalments over 60 months reckoned from the Effective Date. The actual Effective Date shall be once all conditions precedent to the Proposed Transaction have been fulfilled or waived.

Liquidity requirements:

In order to further assist Cell C with its working capital requirements, TPC shall:

  • purchase Cell C prepaid airtime for a purchase price of R1.2 billion (inclusive of VAT) on the Effective Date; and
  • purchase, by way of four further quarterly payments of R300 million (inclusive of VAT), additional prepaid airtime, with each such quarterly payment payable at the beginning of each calendar quarter. The first such quarterly payment will be made at the beginning of the 13th month following the recapitalisation of Cell C and subsequent payments will be made at the commencement of each quarter thereafter.

Furthermore, in conjunction with other third parties, TPC shall undertake to purchase certain minimum levels of prepaid airtime from Cell C in accordance with an agreed monthly schedule or otherwise in accordance with market requirements.

The prepaid airtime to be acquired by TPC from Cell C pursuant to the above prepaid airtime transactions, forms part of the average monthly prepaid airtime acquisitions by TPC of Cell C prepaid airtime in the ordinary course of business.

TPC will raise c.R1.6 billion of the required funds from financial institutions, through an Airtime Purchase transaction, for the purpose of facilitating the Proposed Transaction, and will have an obligation to repurchase such airtime over a 24 month period in equal monthly instalments. The financial institutions have provided the requisite credit approvals in respect of the airtime purchase transaction, which are subject to the conclusion of all legal documentation and fulfilment of all conditions precedent under such legal documentation.

In addition to the conclusion of the Umbrella Restructure Term Sheet, the following transactions will be implemented and agreements in respect thereof have been concluded (conditional upon the Proposed Transaction) being unconditional (save for conditions related to such arrangements being unconditional or implemented) whereby TPC will acquire:

  • from certain funders to Cell C their right to reinvest in the Reinvestment Instrument available to them for a purchase consideration of R1 from each such funder. Following such acquisition by TPC of such rights, TPC will invest an aggregate amount of R110 million into Cell C via the Reinvestment Instrument;
  • debt notes in Cedar Cellular Investment 1 (RF) Proprietary Limited, a shareholder in Cell C, for a purchase consideration of USD500 000 and R16 million;
  • a credit claim of USD6 million against Cell C for an amount of USD4 million, and which claim will then be subject to a compromise as between TPC and Cell C; and
  • certain trade claims against Cell C, which claims shall be acquired for an aggregate amount of R16 million and USD4.5 million and which claims will then be subject to a compromise as between TPC and Cell C.

Subsequent events:

Certain of the Secured Lenders of Cell C, are holders of formerly publicly listed notes issued by Cell C described as USD184 002 000 8.625% First Priority Senior Secured Notes. Shareholders were notified of the convening of a meeting of the holders of the Notes ("Noteholders") for Noteholders to approve an extraordinary resolution which, among other things, will give effect to the compromising of the Noteholders' claims ("Compromise Offer").

In terms of the Compromise Offer, Cell C shall, inter alia, restructure its debt owing to certain secured lenders totalling c.R7.3 billion, with such amount being fixed as at November 2019, by compromising the secured lenders' claims by an offer of 20c to the rand.

The Noteholder meeting was held on 5 July 2022 and Noteholders with the requisite majority voted resolutions in favour of, among other things, the compromise offer as set out in Cell C's consent solicitation memorandum.

The binding long form agreements are expected to be completed in their entirety shortly. It is anticipated that the recapitalisation process, the completion of which has endured for longer than initially anticipated, is expected to close by mid-September 2022. Refer to note 3.7 for the probability applied by management in determining Cell C's liquidity and solvency and the impact of the application of this on the measurement of the derivative liability.