Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  118 / 198 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 118 / 198 Next Page
Page Background

NOTES TO THE GROUP ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

continued

For the year ended 31 May 2016

BLUE LABEL INTEGRATED ANNUAL REPORT 2016

116

3.

Financial instruments and financial risks

continued

3.1 Financial assets continued

3.1.1 Loans receivable continued

The Group considers its maximum exposure in respect of loans receivable, without taking into account any collateral

and financial guarantees, to be as follows:

2016

R’000

2015

R’000

Group 1

5 427

—

Group 2

98 340

74 083

Group 3

360

219

104 127

74 302

The rating groups for counterparties are categorised as follows:

Group 1 – New customers/related parties (less than six months).

Group 2 – Existing customers/related parties (more than six months) with no defaults in the past.

Group 3 – Existing customers/related parties (more than six months) with some defaults in the past.

All defaults were fully recovered or are in the process of being recovered.

3.1.2 Trade and other receivables

Trade receivables are amounts due from customers for goods sold or services performed in the ordinary course of

business. If collection is expected in the normal operating cycle of the business, they are classified as current assets.

If not, they are presented as non-current assets.

Trade receivables are recognised initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the

effective interest rate method, less provision for impairment. A provision for impairment of trade receivables is

established when there is objective evidence that the Group will not be able to collect all amounts due according to

the original terms of receivables. The amount of the provision is the difference between the asset’s carrying amount

and the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at the original effective interest rate. The amount

of the provision is recognised in the income statement.

Critical accounting estimates and assumptions

Management has assessed the probabilities on the contingent sale arrangement.

2016

R’000

2015

R’000

Trade receivables

2 474 675

2 642 059

Less:

Provision for impairment

(13 850)

(10 927)

2 460 825

2 631 132

Sundry debtors

40 570

34 265

Contingent consideration receivable*

15 860

17 757

Prepayments

72 382

68 958

VAT

92 833

15 960

Receivables from related parties (refer to note 8)

25 719

9 178

2 708 189

2 777 250

Less:

Amounts included in current portion of trade and other receivables**

(2 679 023)

(2 712 165)

29 166

65 085

 * Ukash was disposed of in April 2015. The proceeds included a contingent receivable of R17.5 million. The contingent

consideration arrangement requires the acquirer to pay in cash to the Group an additional amount of R18.1 million if certain

warranties are achieved. The amounts are receivable in four six-month intervals commencing 30 September 2015. In the current

year, the Group received R5.8 million relating to this.

** Included in the amount above are starter pack debtors that have a cycle period which may be in excess of 12 months.

Fair value estimation

Fair value measurement hierarchy:

•

Level 1: fair value based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

•

Level 2: fair value based on inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the

asset or liability, either directly (that is, as prices) or indirectly (that is, derived from prices); or

•

Level 3: fair value based on inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (that is,

unobservable inputs).